Plot: In 1946, an ex-Army officer finds hostility and suspicion when he goes to a small desert town. Are they covering up a deep, dark secret?
Stars: Spencer Tracy, Lee Marvin, Walter Brennan, Robert Ryan, Earnest Borgnine, Ann Francis.
Not a Western
Often labeled a "Western" Black Rock is actually a technicolor film-noir, set in small western town. Its closer to Crossfire (1947) , another Dore Sharey anti-racist sermon, then Shane or True Grit. Only 81 minutes, we follow Spenser Tracy, a crippled Veteran, as he tries to find Komoko, a local Japanese farmer, and give him the medal his dead war-hero son earned in Italy. Strangely, no one's seen Komoko since December 8th 1941, and he never made it to the Relocation camp in April 1942.
Still Enjoyable
After the first viewing, Black Rock still remains a pleasurable experience almost in spite of the mediocre script and the melodramatic story. Partly, its the acting. What a great cast! Almost everyone is an academy award winner. And I want Ann Francis running my local Gas station. Why doesn't my mechanic look like her? Also to be enjoyed are the technicolor photography, desert location, and the tight, not a wasted moment, direction.
The Unlikable Hero
Re-watching I was struck by how insulting and self-righteous Tracy's character is. Now, given the evil nature of Ryan and his goons - its justified -to an extent. But Tracy's acts the same way toward the Hotel Clerk, Ann Francis, Walter Brennan and the Sheriff - who all neutral or want to help him! In fact, that's one of the big flaws. Everyone puts up with Tracy's nosey/hostile attitude, when most normal people would've told him to go to hell. After all, he's not a Cop - and they don't have to answer to a self-appointed avenger.
For example, when the scared Telegraph Clerk shows Tracy's telegram to Ryan. Tracy triumphantly thunders that the Clerk has just earned himself "a year in Federal Prison" for divulging a "private telegram." I actually applauded Lee Marvin (who's a rattlesnake in a cowboy hat) when he tore up the telegram and said "No evidence, no crime."
The Overpraised Anti-racism
The movie is constantly overpraised for its "Brave" stance against Anti-Japanese racism. It's a very small part of the movie. Never does Tracy attack the relocation of the Japanese-Americans. He doesn't even mention Komoko's son was a war hero till the very end. Instead, all we get is Tracy sneering at Ryan, when he blames all Japanese-Americans for the Pearl Harbor sneak attack. "Was Komoko at Pearl Harbor?" Tracy snarks.
The movie's Weird view of Patriotism
The movie paints Ryan as a completely black-hearted villain. He's greedy, murderous, nasty, and a complete bigot. He's the obvious bad guy from scene one. But the script paints Ryan as patriotic! Ryan, y'see tried to enlist after Pearl Harbor but was turned down, which made him so angry, he took it out on Komko. Since the producers want us to dislike Ryan, you wonder why they tried to tie Ryan's villainy to his patriotism.
Summary: Despite its flaws of a way-too-old for-the part Spenser Tracy, a melodramatic story and some unrealistic plot holes, Bad Day at Black Rock is still worth re-watching due to the cast and fine direction/photography. Lee Marvin, Ernie Borgnine, and Robert Ryan make a wonderful evil trio and Walter Brennan and Tracy do their usual grand job. But its been overpraised for some run-of-the-mill anti-racism. You wonder how many critics would sing its praises so loudly if "Komoko" had been a German-American. Rating 3 of 4 stars.
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Saturday, May 25, 2019
Bluebeard's Eighth Wife (1939)
Plot: Based on a French Play. A much-married millionaire meets his match in his latest wife.
Stars: Gary Cooper, Claudette Colbert, Everett Sloan, David Niven
Best Quote: Don't forget, Pepinard & Pepinard is a first class firm. You will find that out when you get our bill.
Comedy is hard. Despite being directed by Lubistch, written by Brackett & Wilder, and having an excellent cast, Bluebeard is still nothing more than a C+ Rom-Com - that seems longer than its 80 minute run-time. It starts out well, with a witty scene about buying pajamas*, but once Colbert and Cooper get married halfway-through - and start a "Battle of the Sexes" - it goes flat. The supporting characters are given little to do. Adding to the misery, Colbert and a miscast** Cooper play two unsympathetic characters who have little chemistry. Added: Cooper isn't believable as an international businessman and he lacks the necessary comedic acting chops.***
Summary: Given the talent involved a disappointment. Not bad, and funny at first, its let down by a miscast Gary Cooper and an overall lack of energy and wit. Its too bad, because the story idea is a good one. Its just not executed properly. Rating **1/2 of 4
Notes
* - The stripped pajama bottoms bought by Colbert are later used by her father, which allows Cooper to realize the two are related. Wilder would use the same gag - this time a broken cigarette case - in The Apartment to show Jack Lemmon that MacLaine and Fred McMurray are having an affair.
** - Leaving aside the usual suspects - William Powell and Cary Grant - Clark Gable, Joel McCrea or John Barrymore would've been better. Even Jimmy Cagney could've brought some life to the role. The problem is the role isn't really romantic, its comedic. And ol' Coop isn't funny.
*** This must be where Wilder got the bad idea of casting Cooper in the Rom-Com Love in the Afternoon. It must have felt like a great fit to Wilder, since Cooper once again plays an International businessman/playboy. But he's bad in that movie too. In my opinion, Cooper was too reserved to be a good Rom-Com star. He could do comedy - if he played a comic cowboy or a goofy introvert like Mr. Deeds or the Professor in Balls of Fire.
Stars: Gary Cooper, Claudette Colbert, Everett Sloan, David Niven
Best Quote: Don't forget, Pepinard & Pepinard is a first class firm. You will find that out when you get our bill.
Comedy is hard. Despite being directed by Lubistch, written by Brackett & Wilder, and having an excellent cast, Bluebeard is still nothing more than a C+ Rom-Com - that seems longer than its 80 minute run-time. It starts out well, with a witty scene about buying pajamas*, but once Colbert and Cooper get married halfway-through - and start a "Battle of the Sexes" - it goes flat. The supporting characters are given little to do. Adding to the misery, Colbert and a miscast** Cooper play two unsympathetic characters who have little chemistry. Added: Cooper isn't believable as an international businessman and he lacks the necessary comedic acting chops.***
Summary: Given the talent involved a disappointment. Not bad, and funny at first, its let down by a miscast Gary Cooper and an overall lack of energy and wit. Its too bad, because the story idea is a good one. Its just not executed properly. Rating **1/2 of 4
Notes
* - The stripped pajama bottoms bought by Colbert are later used by her father, which allows Cooper to realize the two are related. Wilder would use the same gag - this time a broken cigarette case - in The Apartment to show Jack Lemmon that MacLaine and Fred McMurray are having an affair.
** - Leaving aside the usual suspects - William Powell and Cary Grant - Clark Gable, Joel McCrea or John Barrymore would've been better. Even Jimmy Cagney could've brought some life to the role. The problem is the role isn't really romantic, its comedic. And ol' Coop isn't funny.
*** This must be where Wilder got the bad idea of casting Cooper in the Rom-Com Love in the Afternoon. It must have felt like a great fit to Wilder, since Cooper once again plays an International businessman/playboy. But he's bad in that movie too. In my opinion, Cooper was too reserved to be a good Rom-Com star. He could do comedy - if he played a comic cowboy or a goofy introvert like Mr. Deeds or the Professor in Balls of Fire.
Sunday, May 12, 2019
Vice (2018)
Plot: A Biography-comedy-drama of Dick Cheney, VP under George Bush.
Stars: Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Amy Adams
What a disappointment. And that's not due to politics. I'm pretty conservative, but I have zero love for Dick Cheney, and I knew the film slanted liberal, before I saw it. But Vice wasn't what I expected - it was so disjointed and scattered. Yes, Bale does a good acting job, but it was a long 132 minutes*. And where was the comedy? There was comic acting - but no laughs. Certainly, the Iraq war - with 600,000 dead Iraqi's - wasn't funny. Nor was 9-11 and 3,000 dead Americans. But it wasn't a "drama" either. Drama about what? As for the Biography part, I lived through the Bush years, and didn't see anything interesting or new**.
Summary: While nominated for an Academy Award, Vice is a mediocre film with some good acting. Its too long, too diffuse, and badly edited. It tries to be funny and dramatic - and fails at both. Unless you're a political junkie and/or hate Dick Cheney, I'd skip it***.
Notes
* = who cares that Dick Cheney worked as a lineman, or was in the Ford and Bush-I administration? Everything prior to 2000 should have been eliminated.
** = And Dick Cheney's isn't interesting - he's just another standard issue Republican pol. And his family life is even more boring.
*** = The Producers should've made a straightforward attack on Bush-II. Why make it about the VP? I assume they lost their nerve.
Stars: Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Amy Adams
What a disappointment. And that's not due to politics. I'm pretty conservative, but I have zero love for Dick Cheney, and I knew the film slanted liberal, before I saw it. But Vice wasn't what I expected - it was so disjointed and scattered. Yes, Bale does a good acting job, but it was a long 132 minutes*. And where was the comedy? There was comic acting - but no laughs. Certainly, the Iraq war - with 600,000 dead Iraqi's - wasn't funny. Nor was 9-11 and 3,000 dead Americans. But it wasn't a "drama" either. Drama about what? As for the Biography part, I lived through the Bush years, and didn't see anything interesting or new**.
Summary: While nominated for an Academy Award, Vice is a mediocre film with some good acting. Its too long, too diffuse, and badly edited. It tries to be funny and dramatic - and fails at both. Unless you're a political junkie and/or hate Dick Cheney, I'd skip it***.
Notes
* = who cares that Dick Cheney worked as a lineman, or was in the Ford and Bush-I administration? Everything prior to 2000 should have been eliminated.
** = And Dick Cheney's isn't interesting - he's just another standard issue Republican pol. And his family life is even more boring.
*** = The Producers should've made a straightforward attack on Bush-II. Why make it about the VP? I assume they lost their nerve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)